Waste of money... - River Twice Philadelphia - Reserveringen te koop
Getting a Reservering at River Twice Philadelphia for Today or Tomorrow is Easy!
Buy a verified reservering at River Twice Philadelphia from someone who doesn't need theirs anymore.
If there is nothing that fits your schedule, you can bid on your preferred time.
We only list verified Reserverings!
All listed Reserverings are reviewed by our team before appearing in the calendar or being allowed to answer a bid you place. That's why AppointmentTrader comes with a included Money Back Guarantee for each transaction.
![Read Less Action Icon](/images/ios-arrow-up.png)
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Philadelphia's Best Restaurants that are most frequently booked by customers of River Twice Philadelphia
Booked 6 times by River Twice Philadelphia customers.
Ranked #4 in Philadelphia's Best Restaurants.
Booked 5 times by River Twice Philadelphia customers.
Ranked #19 in Philadelphia's Best Restaurants.
Booked 1 times by River Twice Philadelphia customers.
Ranked #8 in Philadelphia's Best Restaurants.
🤢 2/5 - Waste of money...
By 👻 @Роман С, 04/08/2024 3:00 am
|
|
River ONCE.... A complete waste of time and money! The food was mediocre. The service was far from ideal, especially if you pay for a prefixed menu for two people - $300 (250 + 50 service fee) plus taxes (no refund!!). Drinks are not included, of course, so our bill for two was almost $450. This was one of the worst experiences, especially for the price. You do expect attention to detail and a real fine dining experience even if it's a more casual style. It felt more like a scam or a rip-off, honestly. So many flaws that I'm even too lazy to describe and put all that into writing. Most likely, the restaurant is going to reply in the same generic way as for others. I can additionally answer in this thread and give my "bullet points" about what exactly was bad. Otherwise, I won't even bother to waste more of my time. My advice - please READ FIRST the BAD REVIEWS; most of what was mentioned earlier was applicable in my case as well.
0 Replys
0 Comments |
Be the first to Reply |